Timeline for Why is antenna aperture a function of wavelength?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 7, 2017 at 0:20 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | You can edit your answer instead of using comments. | |
Jun 7, 2017 at 0:09 | comment | added | sm5bsz | Comments are limited to 600 chars.... The essential thing is that waves in free space couples E and H fields over regions of space size wl/2. Maxwell equations. It is similar in all wave equations - corresponds to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. Local fields that occupy regions of space much smaller than wl/2 do not radiate unless fields are VERY strong, but the radiated field always has "normal" size. | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 23:58 | comment | added | sm5bsz | Look at the antenna as a rx antenna. The incoming wave will generate a current in a matched load. The current creates a wave that partly cancels the incoming wave. If the feed-point is shorted, twice as much current flows, and the antenna reflects the energy from an area twice as large as the capture area. Any antenna that absorbs power generates a re-radiated field with a size proportional to wl/2 or bigger. Free fields can not exist with a smaller size. From that follows that absorbed fields have a size proportional to wl/2. (The above is no proof, maybe inspiration for thinking...) | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 12:38 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | I know that. It's in the formula at the top of the question. Why? | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 3:14 | comment | added | sm5bsz | When the frequency decreases, the power you can extract from that tiny dipole becomes bigger (in proportion to wavelength squared.) | |
May 31, 2017 at 12:51 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | So when I build that tiny dipole with unobtanium which is 100% and has similar gain to a dipole, why does the aperture increase as the frequency decreases? | |
May 30, 2017 at 22:11 | review | Late answers | |||
May 31, 2017 at 2:23 | |||||
May 30, 2017 at 21:53 | history | answered | sm5bsz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |