Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 10, 2020 at 14:36 comment added Mike Waters Please see my completely revised answer, Marcus. I meant coax with ferrite, magnets, etc. as every circulator apparent requires.
Feb 10, 2020 at 8:59 comment added Marcus Müller Coax alone wouldn't work – you need an active component, like the rotating switch array in the article you linked.
Feb 10, 2020 at 4:01 comment added Mike Waters Are you saying that coax absolutely will not work, and it has to be a symmetric balanced transmission line? EDIT: I saw a diagram of one using coax. It had a ferrite sleeve over it to eliminate common-mode currents on the outside of the shield.
Feb 8, 2020 at 19:13 history edited Marcus Müller CC BY-SA 4.0
added 72 characters in body
Feb 8, 2020 at 18:47 history edited Marcus Müller CC BY-SA 4.0
added 274 characters in body
Feb 8, 2020 at 18:33 comment added Marcus Müller @MikeWaters here's a stripline single-Y-junction ferrimagnetic disk circulator: drawing; roughly, 4cm × 5cm.
Feb 8, 2020 at 17:20 review Low quality posts
Feb 8, 2020 at 19:05
Feb 8, 2020 at 17:16 comment added Marcus Müller @MikeWaters stripline circulators start at ca 500 MHz afaik, and that's most of UHF :) anyway, I'd be very interested in the passive non-magnetic circulator's operational principle: My googling for W1HR circulator so far hasn't yielded anything of the likes :(
Feb 8, 2020 at 15:21 comment added Marcus Müller I wouldn't be aware of any non-magnetic, yet passive, solution to the problem: coax is inherently a symmetric thing, and I don't see how you could build a circulator with that. Note: a circulator is not the same as a directive coupler!
Feb 8, 2020 at 13:02 comment added Aleksander Alekseev - R2AUK Thanks for the reply! If I'm not mistaken there are several ways to make a circulator, including one that uses coax cables. However I might be wrong.
Feb 8, 2020 at 11:35 history answered Marcus Müller CC BY-SA 4.0