16
The primary factor to consider is the directivity of the parabolic antenna. It is given as:
$$d=\frac{(\pi D)^2}{\lambda^2} \tag 1$$
where D is the diameter of the dish and $\lambda$ is the wavelength of operation, both in the same units.
To convert frequency to wavelength in meters, we use:
$$\lambda=\frac{300}{f} \tag 2$$
where f is the frequency in ...
15
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for ...
13
They don't always do that, but the reason for it is simply separating the transmitted RF from the received RF. A ground-based repeater uses a fairly large duplexer to make sure that its transmissions don't feed back into its receiver; with a satellite, size and weight are at a premium, and having two widely separated frequencies requires much less hardware ...
11
The specifications from AMSAT for the SO-50 are:
The repeater consists of a miniature VHF receiver with sensitivity of
-124dBm, having an IF bandwidth of 15 KHz. The receive antenna is a 1/4 wave vertical mounted in the top corner of the spacecraft. The
receive audio is filtered and conditioned then gated in the control
electronics prior to feeding ...
10
Satellites can and do use HF for communications.
The first example would of course be Sputnik, which transmitted at 20 and 40 MHz.
Amateurs use HF to communicate with satellites. According to Amsat,
mode A: This mode requires a 2 meter SSB/CW transmitter and a 10 meter SSB/CW receiver...
Mode K; This mode requires a 15 meter SSB/CW transmitter ...
10
Many of the amateur radio satellites are built, owned, and operated by various AMSAT organizations around the world. They typically get their funds from donations and organization membership fees. They're able to keep their costs low by using commodity hardware when possible, utilizing volunteer labor, and sharing launch vehicles with other payloads (...
9
First, consider that everywhere, there is an electric field. For every point in space, this field defines a vector that describes the direction and magnitude of force that would be experienced by a mobile test charge at that point.
In practice, the mobile charges are electrons in our antenna. Radio works by creating waves in the electric field.1 These waves ...
9
I'm guessing many those signals are just noise. A fixed tone carries no information, so there would be no reason for a satellite (or anything else) to transmit it intentionally.
The noise could be from an oscillator in some nearby electronics, or even from within the receiver itself. The noise may not even be at the frequency it appears in the waterfall: ...
8
I'm going to make an educated guess and say no. Here's my reasoning:
Consider the difficulty in just communicating with a satellite. See What is a link budget, and how do I make one? or What gain do I need to talk to SO-50 with my HT?
Geostationary orbit is much farther away than SO-50 and thus requires more gain, or more power.
Now if we are using this ...
8
Satellite engineers tend to use circular polarization for two reasons:
When a linearly polarized signal travels through the atmosphere
there are anomalies, such as Faraday rotation, that alter the
polarization of the EM wave.
The geographic reference of the satellite polarization changes for
a non-stationary satellite as it traverses its path above the ...
7
Take the simplest case of a VHF dipole receiving antenna on board a spin stabilized satellite.
-----------O------------- Here is the satellite now.
\
\
\
\
\
O and here is is a bit later
\
\
\
\
\
As the satellite spins, the dipole rotates, and the resulting polarization ...
6
The doppler shift $\Delta f$ is function of the relative velocity $\Delta v$ (a scalar quantity) and the emitted frequency $f_0$, see the relevant wikipedia page.
If you know how the relative velocity (either at one instant in time or as a function of time), it's just a matter of using the formula:
If you don't known the relative velocity, then you need ...
6
According to the ISS Fan Club's Frequencies page, for FM voice transmissions the downlink (your listening) frequency is 145.800 MHz and the uplink (your transmission) frequency is 144.490 MHz, when covering ITU regions 2 and 3, including North America.
In ITU region 1 the corresponding frequencies are downlink 145.800 MHz and uplink 145.200 MHz.
There are ...
6
Strictly speaking, there are 3 categories of allocations for space missions, depending on what you are doing. And the laws never go away, although the enforcement might go away after a distance. The 3 categories are:
Near Earth Communication- I can't find a specific definition, but this appears to be anything closer than the moon, or that orbits the moon. ...
6
In general, the HF bands (1.8 MHz through 30 MHz) do not have sufficient bandwidth to support live transmission of a video signal. In the US, the FCC does not authorize an emission mode for live video on HF. The lowest available band in the US that supports live video is 70 cm (~440 MHz).
There are, however, options for transmitting pictures on HF. One of ...
6
When all the communications of a satellite qualify as amateur radio satellite communications, then the frequency coordination is carried out by IARU. ITU delegates this function to IARU.
The link provides instructions and information for filing a coordination request.
(Background: I filed a satellite coordination in 2013, launch was in june 2014.)
6
During his long career, J.D. Kraus studied, and experimented extensively with, helix antennas. There is a large body of published work in college text books on this subject. The following summarizes some of the key construction details.
The ideal circumference of each turn of the helix antenna is given as:
$$C=\lambda \tag 1$$
where $\lambda$ is the free ...
6
32-50 degrees EL -- all 11 decodes tonight on JT4G very strong , FT991A 17db LNA, 1/4 hardline 24ft ,Gulf Alpha 8 x 11 beam H-POLE.
JT4G - digital signal mode, http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/JT2_JT4.TXT
FT991A - Yaesu FT991A radio
17dB LNA - low noise amplifier (with 17dB gain perhaps)
1/4 hard-line - the coax connecting the radio to the ...
5
There are at least 4 significant things that make satellites difficult to exactly determine:
The position and velocity of a satellite is only known at any one time with a finite precision. Without a perfect knowledge of where the satellite is and how fast it's moving, it's impossible to know where it will be in the future.
The atmosphere is quite uncertain, ...
5
The reason you don't need to shift one frequency is that the Doppler shift for the 144MHz band, for a satellite in this orbit, is only about 2-3kHz, which is within the range needed to make contact without adjusting. You can, and you'll get better results if you do, but to make satellite operation easy many do not.
The 440MHz band, however, experiences a ...
5
Here in the US, it is perfectly legal for you to listen and "download" the satellite data. Since the data is created by a public agency, it is considered to be in the public domain and not subject to copyright. On this website at http://www.weather.gov/disclaimer, you can find the following:
"The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are ...
5
Here in EU it's perfectly legal to receive transmission on any frequency. Additional restrictions may apply if the transmission is not mean to be public, for example encrypted Wi-Fi networks or government agencies radios. (source: Telekommunikationsgesetz (TKG) § 89).
5
The purpose of a turnstyle antenna for satellite work is to generate a circularly polarized radiation pattern off of its axis. By adjusting the phasing of the feed to the two crossed dipoles, the circular polarization can be switched between left and right hand polarization.
In your diagram of the proposed antenna, one element is shown to meet at is end ...
5
Good find of all the frequencies and powers, it sounds like you have all the right basic equipment.
But sadly for the roadster, you're too late, it's out of range. The video link is designed for a few hundred km, and it's probably half a million km away already.
Assuming the batteries on the spacecraft are still OK. It's transmitting 44 dBm.
The path loss ...
5
All kinds of digital microwave technologies can do this, including WiFi. It takes a good antenna location high from the ground, and good antenna gain / transmit power. Commercial wireless ISPs do it regularly. With a good antenna and cooperative terrain (no hills in the way), it could be done with consumer 802.11 equipment.
Mind the link budget, and the ...
5
It's been done before. The University of Groningen astronomy department runs (ran?) a couple of 2.5 m dishes for radio astronomy exercises. IIRC they mainly observe our Sun (strongest radio source).
So I'd say yes, that dish could be a good starting point.
5
A simple internet search turns up the IARU's Amateur Radio Satellite Frequency Coordination web page. There you will find an Amateur Satellites Short Info Paper that answers your question:
Satellite frequencies in bands allocated to the amateur-satellite
service are coordinated by the IARU Satellite Frequency Coordination
Panel.
As an international ...
4
It is not the spinning of the satellite that polarizes the signal. Rather, it is that a circularly polarized signal can be rotated without affecting the signal which makes circular polarization desirable.
This is not the case with linearly polarized signals: if the two are cross-polarized (one is vertical, the other is horizontal, for example), then the ...
4
Circular polarisation is not caused by the spin of the satellite. The reason for circular polarisation is to make the orientation of the satellite irrelevant. If you were running a linearly polarised antenna and the orientation of the satellite was 90 degrees off, you could get end up with an effectively infinite loss whereas you can always pick up a ...
4
When is the 24 hour window of time when it is nearest the earth going to occur?
The last fix NASA had on it was in 2008, 6 years ago. The position and velocity at that time have been entered into the JPL Horizons software so we can predict its future location with as much accuracy as can be provided by very old data.
On August 9th, 2014 at 19:12UTC, the ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
