15
$\begingroup$

I've had people tell me, anecdotally, that a vertical is noisier than a dipole. Is this true, and if so, why?

If it is true:

Is this additional noise, such that SNR is degraded, or is the vertical just more sensitive overall, making noise and signals equally louder?

Is the noise particular to vertical monopoles? How would a vertical dipole be affected?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Also worth noting, my mag loop antenna is even more silent than my dipoles. Almost zero noise from household appliances $\endgroup$
    – David VK2VXK
    Dec 3, 2013 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ Is the moon further away or by bus? Verticals can be dipoles too. $\endgroup$
    – user10489
    Jun 19, 2020 at 11:57

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
8
$\begingroup$

I have read this too. I don't have personal data to back this up, but the reasoning I have read stated that local RFI (like household appliances) tended to be vertically polarized and hence more able to induce noise onto a vertical antenna than a horizontal one. I'll edit the answer when I find the references.

Meanwhile there are a few really excellent papers on the use of ferrite to eliminate noise from all facets of your shack, I highly recommend them:

Common Modes Chokes (W1HIS)

Cost Effective Ferrite Chokes and Baluns (GM3SEK)

EDIT: After some perusal of the literature, including the ARRL Antenna Handbook, I see nothing scientific to back up the anecdote. Which reminds me of a quote, from whom I forget: "the plural of anecdote is not data".

That said, I found 2 addition items of interest:

  1. vertical antennas are omni-directional and therefore can pick all the noise there is to hear.
  2. A reference that stated that RF noise had random angles of polarization (something that sounds more credible to me) and that RFI noise below VHF travels mostly by ground wave and interaction with the earth attenuates the horizontal component leaving only the vertical component.

I don't know if item 2 is any less of an anecdote than the question at hand, but that's what I have found so far.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ W8JI has a few good anecdotes on the later point. Seems a more reasonable explanation than most. $\endgroup$
    – Phil Frost - W8II
    Nov 26, 2013 at 23:30
  • $\begingroup$ Common mode chokes are used mainly to suppress ones own transmission from travelling back into the shack, causing RFI. I see little relevance to the reception noise (either QRN or QRM) of an antenna. The part about common mode chokes should be left out of this answer. $\endgroup$
    – on4aa
    Nov 29, 2013 at 0:13
  • $\begingroup$ Argument 1 is a false argument: Vertical antennas might be omni-directional, but still they offer a high directivity towards low-angle DX signals. $\endgroup$
    – on4aa
    Nov 29, 2013 at 0:18
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see how argument one is false, there are no nulls on an azimuth plot of a vertical antenna. You will receive noise from any direction at full strength. This is in contrast to, say a yagi with deep side and (sometimes somewhat less) back nulls. $\endgroup$
    – WPrecht
    Nov 29, 2013 at 1:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @on4aa perhaps you should read some of the references. Yes, the primary role of a current choke at the feed point is to keep your signal out of the coax, but some of these authors state that your feed line can pick up signals and therefore chokes at strategic points maybe useful. I am not stating these as gospel, merely relating the results of some actual research. $\endgroup$
    – WPrecht
    Nov 29, 2013 at 1:26
5
$\begingroup$

I live in Seoul, Korea, a city of 15 million, with lots of lights and electronics on late until 11pm. My vertical dipoles I have created are easily 1 to 3 s-units noisier than horizontal dipoles. Absolutely no contest. The vertically-polarized antennas transmit DX very well, however. I actually run two antennas -- horizontal for listening, and transmit. The vertical for transmit (great on longpath), and less for listening, because they are so noisy here (often s5-s8 noise daytime) they are almost useless on receive. Switching between the two is best of both worlds.

That said, I built a 2-el wire 15m yagi, and the noise reduction is yet another 2 to 2.5 s-units under the horizontal dipole! Huge difference. Even though a 2-el yagi only has just under an s-unit gain, at same height as a dipole, the noise reduction is what really takes the cake!

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ is your yagi horizontal or vertical (or, rather, have you tried the other one)? $\endgroup$
    – user10489
    Jun 19, 2020 at 12:01
3
$\begingroup$

Vertical antennas are noisier on HF and below for three main reasons:

  1. At HF and below, vertical antennas have more ohmic losses than horizontal antennas (mainly ground losses). Any ohmic resistance produces white, thermal Johnson–Nyquist noise (QRN) which power is proportional to the square root of the resistance $\sqrt{R}$.
  2. Vertical antennas are often not DC-grounded to earth. This may allow for static electricity to build up under the influence of wind and precipitation. Eventually, a high static voltage will arc over and cause noise at that moment.$^{[1]}$ This may happen at a relatively high frequency. Furthermore, arcing is a non-linear event, causing strong higher frequency harmonics.
  3. Lightning discharges in thunderstorms are mainly vertically polarised. The emissions of lightning peak at around 5 kHz and drop off as a function of $\frac{1}{f}$.$^{[2]}$ Again, a lightning discharge is a non-linear event, causing strong harmonics. At 500 kHz, the signal of all kinds of lightning (earth-cloud, cloud-cloud,...) is still strong. Hence, most lightning detectors listen on 500 kHz because antennas are easier to build than on 5 kHz.

I see little valid argument in that human-made noise (QRM) were predominantly vertically polarised. Wiring in buildings is both vertical and horizontal.

However, overhead power lines are horizontal and do have a vertical electrical field component to earth. Low-voltage overhead power lines are also more prevalent in the US than in Europe, where mainly underground cabling is used for low-voltage domestic power. In absence of any good study data, I would call the debate still open on this point.

References

  1. http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/static.html
  2. Le Vine D. M., "Review of Measurements of the RF Spectrum of Radiation from Lightning,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1987
Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you cite any references? $\endgroup$
    – Phil Frost - W8II
    Dec 1, 2013 at 12:46
  • $\begingroup$ @PhilFrost I have added two references. Stay tuned for a third one about thermal noise from antenna losses. With a search engine you will find references abound, but I want to add a classic one by American physicist John D. Kraus, W8JK. $\endgroup$
    – on4aa
    Dec 3, 2013 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ Your first reference is 404. $\endgroup$
    – Phil Frost - W8II
    Feb 10, 2014 at 19:37
1
$\begingroup$

I'd like to corroborate one of the other anecdotal answers: my vertical is both extremely sensitive and noisy. It picks up all kinds of noise from my suburban neighborhood, even with my entire house powered off, that's totally absent on other antennas. It definitely has the worst SNR compared to my other antennas, at least in my situation.

A lot of this is going to depend on what kind of noise you're worried about. One other guy here is talking about QRN from Nyquist noise or something. I would love to have that problem! If you live anywhere even remotely urban, QRN definitely doesn't matter.

I'm still a new ham but my experience so far makes me skeptical of a lot of these electromagnetic theory reasons, like polarization, different kinds of fields, etc. The real world is too imperfect for a lot of those things to dominate.

In compromised locations, a vertical is a lot easier to get elevated, and as long as you do a reasonable job with the ground plane, it's easier to get a nicely resonant antenna. If you plot the direction from your neighbors' houses to your vertical, it's probably a pretty straight shot to most of the antenna, in a direction where it is near its highest gain. But with an inverted V near the ground, I think that's less likely to be true. Maybe if you had your horizontal dipole elevated to the ideal height, and oriented broadside to QRM sources, it would be just as noisy.

For the record, my end-fed random wire is even less noisy than the dipole, so it's not a matter of being balanced or anything.

One other thing: my vertical is carefully tuned with loading coils etc. But it seems to me that the resonant regions actually have worse SNR!

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .