I plan to build trapped multiband dipole so I read lots of documentation I found.

There is one thing that confuses me: various authors recommend setting resonant trap frequency differently: some say trap should be resonant just below wanted band, some says it should be resonant in middle of the band, and some say trap should resonate just above the band.

What is correct approach?


1 Answer 1


In tuning a trap there are two concerns which are somewhat contradictory:

  1. You want the trap to have a high impedance on the target band.
  2. You want losses to be low.

The objective of a trap is to reduce the currents on the inactive portion of the antenna to a negligible amount. This doesn't require an impedance that's as high as possible: it requires only an impedance that's high enough.

In any LC circuit such as a trap, the current or voltage circulating between the inductor and capacitor is at a maximum at resonance. The trap is a parallel LC circuit and a high impedance (high ratio of voltage to current) at resonance. Because the capacitor and inductor are in a loop, current can flow around that loop without adding to the current through the trap. That circulating current serves to charge the capacitor to a high voltage in cooperation with the voltage applied to the trap, allowing a higher voltage to be attained with less current (the definition of high impedance). But this high circulating current means high resistive losses, and the high voltage means high dielectric losses.

Logically then, we want to tune the trap such that the impedance in the operating band is high enough, but no higher. In practice putting the the trap resonance just outside the band is effective: for any reasonable trap design this will provide an impedance that is high enough, while keeping the resonance and associated high losses where they will not be encountered in operation.

Tuning resonance to be above or below the band does not matter much. It will affect the phase shift between the active and inactive sections of the antenna, but since the inactive section of the antenna has not much current on it, this isn't very important. It will have some effect on the tuning of the antenna, and the electrical length of the antenna on bands where the trap is bypassed. But these are all things easily compensated when tuning the antenna by adjusting length, etc.

For further reading, W8JI has a good article on traps which includes some measured data for traps of several types.

  • $\begingroup$ It seems more clear now. Thanks a lot. Your overall contribution at StackExchange is the best I have seen. For short conclusion: trap would do the job in all three setups (resonance just below operating band, at the center of band and just above), but loses will bi high if set in center of band? One additional question: when I measured some traps, I noticed that Z and X are higher on frequencies below trap resonant frequency and trending to significantly drop on frequencies above resonant frequency. Does that matter for choosing trap resonant frequency? $\endgroup$ May 21, 2017 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ @PedjaYT9TP What you should see for a typical trap is it looks inductive at frequencies below resonance, and capacitive above resonance. It might be best to post a new question with graphs or data from an analyzer for a more detail. $\endgroup$ May 22, 2017 at 1:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .