1
$\begingroup$

The mode of SSB is alive and well. It has relevance for long-distance comms and does not waste spectrum. The orthodox methods of generation are Filter, Phasing and Weaver. These methods can be and are done in DSP or firmware but the fundamentals are the same. The resulting low-level analog RF signal goes to a linear amp possibly via one or more hetrodyning stages. The linear amp has not gotten much more efficient since the 1960s. So the more efficient classes of PA operation are not utilised in practical SSB rigs. Example FM and its digital cousin FSK are fine running class C or the less-documented class E. It has been said that it's mathematically possible to apply AM and FM to a RF carrier simultaneously to make SSB.

The Amateur who said this may be very very old now. When he was in his heyday it would not have been practical but the question is: Can we do this now?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I've read of creating 100% modulation AM by mixing 2 FM with opposite deviation. A very high power factor results. $\endgroup$ – Optionparty Jan 31 '16 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ That if I can spell it is "cherioux Outphasing Modulation " There are lots of high efficiency ways of making AM these days .Using class D PWM as a series modulator into a class C or Class E final works well and is done often.The old way of the class B audio AMP ,modulation transformer and class C fiinal has provided yeoman service for many decades and is much more power efficient than SSB linear.When you factor in power efficiency into the SSB VS AM advantage things are not as good as people are taught. $\endgroup$ – Autistic Jan 31 '16 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think this directly answers your question, but when using SDR transmitters I think one can account for some amplifier non-linearities by measuring and then cancelling it out via software. For example, the OpenHDSR project calls this Pure Signal. The more general term would be predistortion (think of it like "inverse distortion"). $\endgroup$ – natevw - AF7TB Feb 1 '16 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ Autistic, I'm sorry, but information-theoretically, SSB does waste spectrum, and is not very efficient. The information theoreticians can quantify the amount of information audio as transportable by SSB can carry (we even quantify that in bits, if it can be quantized), and the amount of bandwidth used for that is simply larger than with less archaic modes! That doesn't mean SSB is dead. It just means it's mathematically provable not efficient. $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller May 3 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ And as an electrical engineer I can fullheartedly tell you that linear RF amplifiers have come a long way since the 1960s in terms of efficiency. If they didn't, your smartphone couldn't ever communicate more than a few kilobit per second (because the power efficiency vs linearity tradeoff would mean that the amplifiers wouldn't be very linear at all), and its battery would last minutes, probably. $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller May 3 at 23:12
7
$\begingroup$

I could imagine a class D pwm system doing the Envelope and the phase modulated carrier getting clipped and fed into a class E amplifier and then you could run 100Watts with no heatsinks allowing smaller cheaper equipment .ZL4TIY

We have demonstrated a system very much like this. See:

The Polar Explorer: You may never look at your “linear amplifer” the same way again.

In this article, we describe the motivation for and execution of a 55-W SSB transmitter that employs: DSP to generate "baseband" envelope and phase modulation signals; a class D amplifier to increase the envelope signal amplitude for application to the drain of the class E amplifier MOSFET; a quadrature digital upconverter (QDUC) chip to produce the phase modulation gate drive at the carrier frequency.

Of almost equal importance, we demonstrate means of correcting the AM-AM and AM-PM conversion errors in the amplifier system to reduce third-order intermodulation products to the range of -40dBc.

We have made significant advances in the eighteen months since this article was submitted for publication.

Brian Machesney K1LI and
Tony Brock-Fisher K1KP

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer! Could you edit it to include more information than just a link which might be broken in the future? Even the name of your project would be an improvement; a summary would be great. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Reid AG6YO May 3 '17 at 16:55
  • $\begingroup$ @ Brian K1L1 +1 Wow so it is all possible .I have said this but have been to busy designing DC/DC convertors to do any experiments .I am impressed that you have implemented something .Now it is a reality that the linear will go to the meusem . $\endgroup$ – Autistic May 3 '17 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ @KevinReidAG6YO Brian, What in the heck happened to your rep points?! I see it as only 116, and it recently was a four-digit number. I'm going to take this up with the other moderators. Wasn't it over 2000? $\endgroup$ – Mike Waters May 3 at 23:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MikeWaters No glitch, just two different accounts. They can be merged if the account holder wishes: ham.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts $\endgroup$ – Kevin Reid AG6YO May 3 at 23:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MikeWaters two different site users: ham.stackexchange.com/users/11452/brian-k1li $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller May 3 at 23:21
2
$\begingroup$

It has been said that it's mathematically possible to apply AM and FM to a RF carrier simultaneously to make SSB.

This is true. However, it's equally true of every other modulation — not just SSB. This is easiest to see from the DSP perspective, where we work with complex-valued signals almost all the time. "AM and FM simultaneously" is just the polar (rather than Cartesian) breakdown of the complex baseband signal.

This actually has an application in RF electronics, which is probably the idea you heard about: I've heard it under the name polar amplifier, and indeed it is theoretically more efficient than an ordinary linear amplifier. The major problems of using a polar amplifier are generating the nonstandard driving signals and getting the proper phase alignment between the phase control and amplitude control. (Here's a document I just found discussing the design (in Chapter 4); it calls the thing a "polar modulated power amplifier".)

So, as far as I know you could certainly build a complete SSB transmitter this way. It would be a substantial engineering challenge, and it would hopefully be more efficient.

However, given that in practice the modulation would be implemented by DSP producing the phase and amplitude signals, and the most straightforward way to do that I can think of is to apply one of the standard methods to convert the real audio to IQ (Cartesian) SSB, then convert to polar, it doesn't seem quite right to call this truly a fourth method of generating SSB.

(Also, in DSP, the filter method and the phasing method are essentially the same thing, and the Weaver method is just breaking up the math into slightly different parts.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is good to see an answer +1 .I could imagine a class Di pwm system doing the Envelope and the phase modulated carrier getting clipped and fed into a class E amplifier and then you could run 100Watts with no heatsinks allowing smaller cheaper equipment .ZL4TIY $\endgroup$ – Autistic Jan 31 '16 at 5:50
  • $\begingroup$ The envelope tracking scheme shown in the thesis could be helpful in high efficiency SSB $\endgroup$ – Autistic Jan 31 '16 at 19:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.