Are there any 2m and/or 440cm FM mobile radios that have audio inputs for supporting digital modes, like PSK31 or SSTV?

I have a Rigblaster that I use with my HF radio so I could get a mike cable and connect it directly to the mike input in the same way, but is there any VHF/UHF radio available that has better options for connectivity for working digital modes on VHF/UHF?


4 Answers 4


Most modern VHF/UHF FM mobile rigs designed for Amateur Radio use have a "data" connector on the back. Currently manufactured dual-band examples include Yaesu FT-7900, Kenwood TM-V71, Icom IC-208H - they all have the same 6-pin mini-DIN "data" connector using the same main pinout.

The 6-pin data connector is originally designed for attaching packet radio TNCs and other data equipment, and usually has at least the following pins:

  • Ground
  • TX audio in (transmitted audio)
  • PTT (ground to transmit)
  • RX audio out, "1200 bit/s" "normal audio"
  • RX audio out, "9600 bit/s" discriminator output

I quoted the bit rates, since the radio documentation often cites these standard packet radio speeds, although in reality it's just audio, and the radio doesn't really care about any bit rates as such. The "9600" pin audio output is taken before audio filter/amplifier stages of the radio, and has a flatter audio frequency response that is good for high speed data such as 9600 bit/s packet or AIS reception.

Technically, you can run SSTV or PSK31 over FM, and that "data" connector will suit that purpose perfectly. But it's not overly popular in most areas, so you might have to talk some friends to play with it. Most of SSTV and PSK31 activity is on HF SSB, although VHF/UHF digital chat as such should be a lot of fun.

PSK31 over FM in particular is quite strange and unusual, since PSK31 is designed to be a very narrow-bandwidth (31.25 Hz) mode for SSB transceivers, and transmitting it over FM (some 20 KHz) would be a waste of perfectly good radio spectrum and transmitter power. It works, but it's not efficient. Then again, it might be fun, and if you live in an area where most of 70cm is almost completely quiet and inactive (like I do), a little inefficiency on an irregular basis is not going to do harm, if you're having fun. A lot of amateur FM voice communications don't have a lot of useful information content, either.

SSTV isn't so narrow (about 3 kHz), and there have been more or less official FM channel allocations for it. Some US web sites cite VHF/UHF SSTV AFSK FM calling frequencies. IARU Region 1 (Europe) SSTV(FM/AFSK) frequency for 70 cm is currently 433.400.

I also often use the "data" connector of my FT-7800 for recording received voice communications on a computer. Works fine.


Sure, most radios have the ability to patch in audio. If it isn't through the front microphone connector, it's through an accessory connector, which is available on every commercial radio I'm aware of - although perhaps only on a few amateur mobiles.

But why would you want to? SSTV and PSK31 cannot be reasonably transmitted over FM. FM transmits a carrier at a single frequency that is modulated. That is not the same as the SSB that is used in HF transceivers for digital mode operation - it's a completely different kind of modulation. In SSB, the bandwidth actually occupied by the output signal is equal to the bandwith occupied by the input signal - so if your input audio shifts by 31.25Hz, your output RF shifts by 31.25Hz. In FM, every input signal uses up the entire channel width. You couldn't use something like fldigi to receive multiple PSK31 signals in the same FM channel at once, because your FM receiver is physically incapable of receiving and demodulating more than one signal at a time. You would effectively be taking up an entire FM channel but only using less than one percent of it. SSTV operates in a similar way. The properties of FM do not allow for use of digital modes in the same way as SSB does.

If you want to use digital in VHF/UHF, you need either an SSB transceiver (might be available for 2 meters?) or a digital radio (using D-STAR, TRBO, or something else) or an SDR (a software defined radio may allow the necessary types of operation).

There are a few modes that sacrifice radio efficiency in exchange for simplicity, such as APRS, however APRS has much shorter transmit durations than PSK31 allowing for the frequency to be shared (I've seen operators with an active PSK31 signal for over a minute, imagine the APRS pileup if every station in range was forced to wait that long for an open carrier). The root of the difference is that PSK31 - very small bandwidth but very slow - was designed for Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), while APRS was designed for Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) all on the same frequency.

If you'll excuse a few signal processing terms, SSB as a modulation scheme is a linear function - that means that adding two audio signals together and passing it through SSB results in the same thing as if the audio signals had been encoded individually - whereas FM is not. This interesting property of SSB is what makes it possible to receive more than one signal at once. Linear modulation schemes like SSB preserve FDMA as well as TDMA, however nonlinear modulation schemes like FM preserve only TDMA, and not FDMA.


  • $\begingroup$ The same reasoning should probably also be used to argue that APRS as it exists should be banned as unreasonable (putting 1200 bit/s AFSK in FM is quite silly by today's technical standards), but it's still a lot of fun according to many. It's certainly digital, and uses plain analog FM radios. $\endgroup$
    – oh7lzb
    Oct 30, 2013 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, APRS is pretty silly too just because there are so many ways to fit more data in there with no bandwidth hit. But APRS at least is designed for stations to be able to coexist and short messages are the norm, vs PSK31 where a single station could tie up the carrierfor over a minute. $\endgroup$
    – Dan KD2EE
    Oct 30, 2013 at 17:03
  • $\begingroup$ APRS does not need a "digital radio", maybe could edit to address that? $\endgroup$
    – oh7lzb
    Oct 30, 2013 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this is good info to bear in mind. Since I've been enjoying digital modes on HF I was looking at options to do the same on VHF/UHF, but looks like an FM only transceiver is not the way to go. Thanks for the info. $\endgroup$ Oct 30, 2013 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ Just as a note - I doubt you'd find much PSK31 activity above 2 meters anyway, since you just don't have the same propagation characteristics. $\endgroup$
    – Dan KD2EE
    Oct 30, 2013 at 17:41

VHF FM Radios are commonly used for packet radio via digipeaters and nodes on frequencies around 145.01 MHz. DSTAR and Yaesu's new System Fusion radios are also digital modulation transmitted over FM radios. In some localities, other soundcard modes are used on VHF/UHF FM radios, such as the SSTV net on 145.51 MHz FM in Sacramento CA http://www.n6na.org/nets/sstv-net Such nets allow owners of common FM transceivers to get experience with these modes. I use the rear data connector on my Yaesu FT-8800R for soundcard modes with a SignaLink USB and also with my packet TNC.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Carol - since I posted this I worked out how to hook up my Rigblaster to my Icom880 and I've played with some packet, connecting to the Berry BBS. I need to try out our SSTV net too, that's still on my todo list :-) $\endgroup$ Sep 10, 2014 at 5:04

SSTV from the ISS (249 miles in orbit) because its fun!

HF digi modes over FM may not be as efficient as hf but they are fun to play with. New hams getting their first radio can play with the modes. That should be encouraged Give them a taste of those modes and soon you may have new General class hams on your hands. You won't get weak signal performance true, but many new hams only have an FM dual band ht anyway. Get them interested. RTTY is an excellent keyboard chat for simplex. SSTV both digital and analog is fun to use. I have run a net for over a year teaching new hams and old alike to fall in love with the various modes. You probably won't work that 100 mile range, Don't get the weak signal expectation going. 5 watts of FM simplex isn't going to work that far. But you can have fun with what it will do. Why? Because you can and it is fun. APRS isn't for everyone. But a RTTY chat is easy and works well with strong signals. (https://i.sstatic.net/w3sfW.jpg)

  • $\begingroup$ I haven't received SSTV from the ISS yet, definitely on my todo list! I have bounced an APRS packet via the ISS digipeater though, and that was a blast to hear it echoed back, and see that it was received by others on the map! $\endgroup$ Jan 12, 2017 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to ham.stackexchange.com Todd, and thanks for the answer! By the way, we recommend all new users take the tour to get the most from the site, and it can't hurt to read how to answer also. $\endgroup$
    – rclocher3
    Jan 12, 2017 at 17:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .