What kinds of configurations should I try when trying to make the physically smallest 2.4 GHz (ISM band) antenna that is significantly directional front-to-back. "Smallest" meaning in in cm maximum dimension. "Significant" meaning quickly measurable as above above typical ISM band noise floors when turning the antenna around.

  • $\begingroup$ Are you only looking for good F/B, or do you want a narrow 3dB beamwidth? It is possible to get a very large F/B ratio from a small antenna , only 1/2 by 1/4 wavelengths, but this antenna has a wide beam and a narrow deep null. The null can be used for accurate direction finding. Will this work? $\endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    Mar 22, 2015 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ A wide beam with a deep null would meet my criteria, as long as the null isn't so narrow that it can't be found handheld by a typical human. $\endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    Mar 22, 2015 at 5:08
  • $\begingroup$ This doesn't have any objective criteria for an answer. Smaller antennas mean lower directivity in general, so asking for the "smallest directional antenna" is like asking for the "lightest gold brick of high value". $\endgroup$ Mar 23, 2015 at 19:27
  • $\begingroup$ Chicken. Egg. I won't know what exact objective front-to-back gain and bean widths I need until I build one or more and play with them in the yard to see if I can DF my target in a reasonable amount of time. But I don't want to build anything big (if possible). $\endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    Mar 23, 2015 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ It's not possible. But it sounds like the question you actually want to ask is "What antenna can I build for direction finding?" $\endgroup$ Mar 24, 2015 at 13:07

1 Answer 1


(Sorry about the long delay)

An antenna that might meet your requirements is called the HB9CV. It's an array with two dipoles about 1/4 wave apart, driven with the correct current that they add in-phase in the forward direction, and completely out of phase in the backward direction.

Getting the currents to do this isn't trivial, because they interact with each other, but Mr Baumgartner, HB9CV, designed this neat way of doing it.

I built mine for the 2 m amateur band, 15 years ago, after some optimisation in NEC. It worked well, had a sharp null which produced a nice "Crunch" of static in the receiver as I rotated the null past the direction of the source. Searching now on the net, I can find instructions but no simulated patterns, so here they are.

A 3D pattern, which looks cute but doesn't really tell you anything:
3D pattern

And a 2D cut at Theta=90, on the horizon, which looks great:
2D cut on Theta=90

A compact antenna can't really have high gain, or a narrow beam in the front, but it can have this deep null. The one above is over 30 dB deep, in simulation, in practice you won't achieve this.

This is the layout of the antenna, I made it with soldered copper water pipe:
HB9CV for 145 MHz
Dimensions are in m, for 145 MHz, so you could scale these down by about 16.8 times for 2450 MHz. But it will get very fiddly making the antenna out of piping, so I proposed you make it on a PCB, like this:

The two colours represent the copper on the two sides of the PCB.

This is obviously an incomplete design, I can't simulate it on PCB for you, so there will be some more research, design and trial and error required to get it working.

The final size is reduced slightly by the PCB, if I remember correctly, to about 80% for the dipole lengths, and say 90% for the spacings. So the final PCB will be about 50 x 50 mm.

Hope that is small enough for you!

  • $\begingroup$ Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for. $\endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    Mar 24, 2015 at 17:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .