# Why are longer antennas not suitable to pick higher frequencies?

I know that the length of an antenna depends on the wavelength of the frequency it's trying to receive.

A higher frequency needs a shorter antenna and vice versa.

I can see that with a high frequency like 500 kHz, an antenna should be around 28,000 cm (280 m) in length, otherwise the EM waves are too long to resonate your antenna properly: Dipole Calculator

But I don't understand the issue with lower frequency antennas. Why can't the same antenna as above be used for a 900 MHz frequency? Doesn't the EM wave end up hitting the electrons somewhere on that long antenna?

Also, how come radios in cars can pick up AM 500 kHz frequencies with ease having such small antennas on the roof of the car? Their length is nowhere near 28,000 cm.

• I'm not sure your premise about "a higher frequency needs a shorter antenna" is correct; for example, with a dipole, any odd integer multiple of a half wavelength is going to be near resonance and will work for either transmit or receive. So a 40m dipole is often resonant on 15m as well; albeit with a different radiation pattern. Similarly a Beverage antenna, only really used for receiving, is often much longer than the frequencies to be received. As a matter of practicality, it is wasteful to make an antenna larger than it need be, but it is not the same as saying it won't work. Commented May 4, 2022 at 18:24
• If the antenna is too long, the waves on one part of the antenna cancel out the waves on another part of the antenna. (Intuitive description only, do not use for calculations) Commented May 5, 2022 at 9:23
• As @hotpaw2 mentions in the end of his answer, cars probably were not even using the now outdated 2–3 ft. long FM antennas, but rather a separate "loopstick" antenna for AM reception. Commented May 9, 2022 at 23:10
• @natevw-AF7TB thanks for the link, helped a lot.
– Dan
Commented May 13, 2022 at 13:43

This is sort of two questions, but they are related.

The first question asks why a car AM receiving aerial works to receive 500kHz when mathematically speaking the electrical length of a $$1/4\lambda$$ for 500kHz should be something like 143m.

The obvious answer is that receiving is different than transmitting. Broadcast AM stations use all sorts of clever tricks to get their megawatt signal out without burning up their finals, and all of them centre around providing that real or pretend electrical length of 10s of metres of antenna to blanket their area with enough energy so little bits of metal on receivers can be used to recover that energy and turn it into intelligence. Receiving antennas just have to be good enough to pick up the $$\mu$$w signal for the front-end to amplify it. Building your own station to transmit even a modest amount of wattage at lower frequencies would work great as an air and ground warmer if you used a little car antenna -- even if you could convince your modern transmitter to send more than a few milliwatts of power to the antenna.

(Also, the fact is that the metal aerial on your car is probably only used for FM reception. The AM receiver probably still uses an internal ferrite loopstick antenna, which is much longer [electrically]. The outside aerial is much closer to a $$1/4\lambda$$ for the FM band.)

Receiving is different from transmitting in another fundamental manner: radiation patterns. For receiving (HF, at least) we don't really care about the pattern. We stick our metal flag into the RF breeze and hope for the best. But for this to work the transmitter has to sweat the details about the radiation pattern and take-off angle, especially if we are talking multi-hop propagation. And the nodes of RF along a radiating antenna, along with how that interacts with the ground and other objects around it, is going to result in very different radiation patterns at different resonances (and non-resonances). And, therefore, how well you are heard at that frequency.

As for why longer antennas are bad for higher frequencies, the short answer is that they aren't. At least not necessarily. If you can find the right electrical length (either by tuning the actual length, or by using traps or coils) then experimentation has shown that (with the right feedpoint) some number of $$1/2\lambda$$ lengths of wire can work ok with a variety of frequencies. But there are practical limits to how many $$1/2\lambda$$ multiples can be present, which means longer (physically or electrically) antennas will never work very well for VHF.

The physics and theory for why this is so I will leave up to the experts here. But my understanding is that resonance is hand-in-glove with feedpoint impedance. And impedance directly affects how much RF energy you can push into an antenna system and expect to radiate into free space in some manner that means you'll be heard.

But Amateur radio is full of enterprising hams who threw any old length of wire out the window and used that (along with a tuner, ideally, at least to protect the transmitter), trimming as necessary, to make contacts on a number of lower bands. The sheer amount of space in ham periodicals over the decades dedicated to multi-band compromise antennas is proof enough of this.

In fact, this (and concerns about harmonics which were a common problem with early transmitters) is why the bands are arranged and separated as they are; the frequencies across the bands often relate to each other as whole number factors from each other.

I've not gone into real-world considerations like velocity factors and copper losses and free-space behaviour of a wire antenna and grounding, all of which affect electrical length, impedance, and radiation patterns, as these are whole subjects on their own.

• Nice answer, John. Another important factor is the antenna's radiation pattern. A long antenna has sharp lobes and deep nulls. A search here will almost certainly bring up a good explanation of this. And this is easy to model in EZNEC. Commented May 4, 2022 at 21:02
• Fair point @MikeWaters, and one I touch on briefly in my answer, but may not be qualified to expand on! I'll make it more clear that everything in transmission (one you get the RF into the antenna!) is about the radiation pattern.
– user21417
Commented May 4, 2022 at 21:43
• What do you mean by "...turn it into intelligence"? Can you elaborate? Commented May 5, 2022 at 15:04
• @PeterMortensen information theory: RF can carry some sort of information by the transmitter, but we don't know that until we both receive the RF at some level necessary and demodulate it. This information is the intelligence sent using the RF energy. The intelligence could be carried by a simple interrupted carrier, or it could be as fancy as phase modulated data.
– user21417
Commented May 5, 2022 at 22:15

A long antenna acts like a lot of little short antennas, all wired together.

Note that depending on the angle of the signal to the big antenna, the distance to each short antenna from the source can be different. For a big antenna the difference between these distances to each short antenna can be half a wavelength or longer.

Note also that the electrical distance from each short antenna to the longer antenna's feedpoint will also vary, for a big enough antenna by half a wavelength or more.

If the total variation in these distances for any two short antennas is an odd multiple of half a wavelength, the signals can cancel out, resulting in those portions not adding up to being a good antenna.

A large antenna has a lot more opportunities than a short antenna for these cancellations, depending on the frequency and the angle to the incoming EM wavefront, because more portions of a large antenna are farther apart, often by a half wavelength or more. (for a given finite element size partitioning)

There can also be signal reinforcements as well as cancellations, making the antenna pattern and aiming it a very hard problem to solve, with slight differences in antenna geometry or aim often making a good very long antenna into a dummy load that receives very little of some desired signal at some desired frequency.

AM radios in pockets or cars usually use an internal ferrite rod loopstick antenna, where the permeability of the ferrite core in conjunction with a very large number of turns (windings) capture as much magnetic energy from an MF RF EM field as a many magnitudes larger (much longer than the whip on the hood) wire antenna in free space.

• Upvoted especially for noting that most MW-inclusive receivers use an internal loopstick even if they also have a visible external antenna for other parts of their tuning range! Commented May 9, 2022 at 23:06