Say you have a resonant antenna that also has a tuner. Does this help at all? Can your antenna be "fine tuned" ?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What if it's resonant but at 73 ohms, not 50? $\endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 22:05

2 Answers 2


This is one of those areas where "words matter"

The typical "tuner" may actually accomplish one or more of several functions:

  • matches impedance between two "things", for ex a radio to a feed line or a feed line to an antenna;
  • tranforms a balanced line to an unbalanced line, or vice versa
  • introduces complimentary complex impedance to maximize power transfer
  • other stuff that doesn't immediately come to mind

SO, the answer is: it depends on the characteristics of the antenna system.

If the characteristics of your antenna for all of the above concerns are optimized for your frequency of choice and antenna installation particulars, then a "tuner" doesn't do anything for you.

In fact, since any real tuner has some kind of insertion loss, there may be a net-negative effect by introducing it into an already resonant and well matched system.

If the antenna system is of sufficiently high Q, and you want to choose another frequency, then one or more of the above concerns will become interesting and some kind of "tuner" may become helpful.

For example, depending upon the Q of the antenna and the size of the band and the operator's definition of acceptable. From 3.5 MHz to 4 MHz is only 500 KHz... but ±250 KHz/3.75 MHz (the center of the 80m band) is about 7%. A tuner would almost certainly required (preferably at the feed point) to operate the entire band.

At 2m, ±2 MHz / 146 MHz is a little more than 1%, and a tuner wouldn't be required to operate over the entire band.

See also this excellent answer regarding the bandwidth of a dipole

  • $\begingroup$ What about precise variations within the band? The top of the band vrs the bottom, for example, if you are resonant dead center? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ it depends upon the Q of the antenna and the size of the band and the operator's definition of acceptable. From 3.5 MHz to 4 MHz is only 500 KHz... but ±250 KHz/3.75 MHz (the center of the 80m band) is about 7%. At 2m, ±2 MHz / 146 MHz is a little more than 1%. $\endgroup$
    – webmarc
    Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ Not to put too fine a point on it but regarding words that matter, the words, "at all" matter. ;-) Thanks for your answer. I will accept if you move this comment into it. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 21:04
  • $\begingroup$ Consider the case of an unused tuner that you spent hard earned cash on and then got a resonant antenna. It seems like you can get some benefit if you leave the tuner in. 7%-1% sure ain't a lot but might be better than tossing your tuner in the closet. You might want to keep the tuner around in case your antenna gets destroyed in a storm. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 21:09
  • $\begingroup$ Sadly, $-spent is not part of any antenna equation and must be ignored. Updated answer to include the fact that introducing an antenna tuner to an already well-matched and resonant system can be a net-negative due to insertion loss. Agree that you want to keep the tuner around in case of other situation. $\endgroup$
    – webmarc
    Commented Sep 18, 2021 at 14:46

This question is more complicated than it seems.

If the antenna in question is only being used at one frequency, and at that frequency the SWR is already low, then in terms of obtaining a good match to transmission line and radio there is no advantage in using an antenna tuner. In fact the tuner would introduce a very small amount of insertion loss, and this loss would be higher for higher frequencies.

But, a tuner will probably have a higher Q and so a narrower bandwidth than the antenna, so using a tuner might help a bit with reducing out of band interference or noise.

If the antenna is being used over a band of frequencies such as an amateur band, then if the antenna has a bandwidth such that the SWR isn't good over the entire band, then the tuner is useful because you can adjust to make the SWR perfect over the entire band.

As a rule of thumb, a tuner would not be required if the SWR is less than abupt 1.5:1 over the entire band, where the added messing around of having to adjust the tuner very time you change frequency a bit isn't worth the very small increase in performance obtained by making the SWR exactly perfect.

To be technically accurate, an antenna that is resonant at the frequency of operation isn't necessarily matched to the transmission line and radio. Such an antenna can be resonant and have a resistive impedance which doesn't match the rest of the system and in this case a tuner could be used to match the impedance of the antenna / transmission line to that of the radio.

In general, as soon as a tuner is included, the bandwidth of the entire system will be reduced, and for transmitting, any significant change (more than about 100 kHz) in frequency will probably require re-adjustment of the tuner.

If you are a perfectionist and must always have a perfect SWR regardless of how much difference it makes because it makes you feel better, then if you can live with having to re-adjust every time you change frequency, then using a tuner won't cause any problems and can be left in line.

But in my opinion in general if you can get away with using an antenna which is resonant on it's own without a tuner, that seems to be the cleanest approach with the least messing around.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .