3
$\begingroup$

Good day! I ask for help with repairing the hackrf one amplifier. Doesn't work at all. Accepts signals without amplifier, and LNA and VGA adjustment in SDR sharp works too! But when I put a tick on "Amp", then all signals disappear. As I understand it, I punched through the static through the antenna input. This is not a program error for sure, since I checked it both on the phone and using a portapack. Everywhere the result is the same - I turn on the amplifier - the signal disappears. At the same time, I tried to transmit signals. Everything works for the transfer. I ask for help in identifying the faulty part. I want to renovate. After reading this article https://pc7x.net/archive/mirrors/hackrf-repair/articles/repairing-the-hackrf/index.html, I realized that most likely my LNA chip (U25 in the diagram) burned out. But after all, the LNA gain control works for me. How so? This article also describes that switches U14 and U12 can be broken. Tell me how to determine what is broken, please.enter image description here

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

There are three receive gain stages in the HackRF one. Two of them are on the MAX2837 chip (the ones controlled by "LNA gain" and "VGA gain"), and the third is the MGA81563 preamp, which is either on (+14dB) or off (+0dB), and controlled by the "amp" toggle. You have indeed blown the MGA81563. I did the same thing to one of mine several years back and it behaved exactly the way you described.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

HackRF has three amplifiers in the receive section. The first is a low noise amplifier (LNA) with fixed gain of 14 dB. The second is an Intermediate Frequency (IF) LNA with gain that varies from 0 to 40 dB. Finally, the baseband amplifier gain can be varied from 0 to 62 dB. On the transmit side, there are two amplifiers. The first is an IF LNA with gain that can be varied from 0 to 47 dB. The second amplifier has a fixed gain of 14 dB.

HackRF front-end block diagram from http://onesdr.com

The first amplifier in the receive and the last amplifier in the transmit sections can be switched in and out of the chain. The designers of HackRF picked the same component MGA-81563 with Gain 14 dB, for both these amplifiers. As it turns out, this amplifier component is very susceptible to damage – even when the maximum input signal level of +13 dBm is not exceeded. This has been reported by a number of users. So you will have to indeed confirm that the first LNA is damaged (it often is) and then repair it. More details including a block diagram of the front-end are in the link below. The only issue is that the LNA itself is now obsolete as the manufacturer has stopped making this amp so you have to find one either on amazon or ebay. I think it would be a good idea for the team at HackRF to solve this problem though as there are many good wideband LNA alternatives out there.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here on Amateur Radio Stack Exchange, answers must answer the question in their text, not just provide a link — links are good, but not sufficient. (See ham.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-answer for more information.) Please edit this answer so that it stands on its own. $\endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    Jul 30, 2021 at 21:42
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Okay I will update my response. It is very detailed as you can see from the post. $\endgroup$ Jul 30, 2021 at 22:55
-1
$\begingroup$

The HackRF one design is known to be faulty. See the attached issue thread on github, which I raised more than three years ago. I designed and sold an improved SDR that fixes the flaws outlined in this Github issue: https://github.com/greatscottgadgets/hackrf/issues/541

There are many other parts of the HackRF that can be damaged by excess RF power. The RF switches are among the least likely to fail. The RFFC5071 mixer and the Maxim RF chips are also vulnerable. None is as sensitive as the receive LNA however, which is utterly unprotected.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello and welcome to ham.stackexchange.com! I hear what you're saying, and you may well have a legitimate gripe, but I must warn you that the tone you used is not considered acceptable in this site. (See the Code of Conduct.) Please be respectful of all others in your future posts here. $\endgroup$
    – rclocher3
    Oct 20, 2021 at 0:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .