-1
$\begingroup$

Imagine a group of eight or more vertical masts. On each mast is a Yagi antenna pointed upward toward the sky. The elements are inverted with the idea being that the incoherent RF coming down is given constructive interference to become useable coherent current. How to successfully connect multiple feeds together to support this desired outcome?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "The elements are inverted"? $\endgroup$ Jan 1 at 13:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Tom, and welcome to ham.stackexchange.com! $\endgroup$
    – rclocher3
    Jan 4 at 15:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question is unclear to me, Tom. Could you please explain what you mean by inverted? A drawing would really help! :-) $\endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jan 8 at 22:19
4
$\begingroup$

Using several antennas to improve HF reception is an old and very effective idea. The trick is combining them correctly. Simply connecting them to a splitter will generate fixed-position lobes of high gain in the sky, and regions of lower gain. For amateurs who are looking for contacts in a wide area, not a single place, this is quite advantageous already.

The udeal is to have the feeds connected to separate receivers, and then to a computer that combines them in the appropriate phase for best SNR.

The computer would first do some direction-finding to find the angle of arrival of the signal, then synthesize a beam in that direction.

The RF from the sky is not incoherent - it is very much coherent and to your "radio eyes" would appear to be coming from a fairly small spot in the sky. This is the basis of Single Site Location, where a single DF system can find the position of a transmitter, using only the angles of arrival and a model of the ionosphere.

Once you have several elements, the advantage (in receiving) of using yagis is reduced. The synthesised beam is fairly small anyway. Commercially available HF DF arrays use a pattern of crossed loops and dipoles laid out on the ground.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ If it's on the same frequency, it's coherent, yes. I wondered if perhaps he wanted to combine out-of-phase, off-frequency noise with s+n on an adjacent frequency to phase out the undesirable noise (which I can testify does not work!). Looking at your profile again, I see you're very qualified to answer this, Tom. :-) I would like to pick your brain sometime in Ham Shack. I suppose you combine more than the two dishes shown there? $\endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jan 9 at 22:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes all 64 :) These HF DF systems are hard to find online, but look at page 64 (called 48) of this dissertation for a photo and some nice background information. $\endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    Jan 10 at 2:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.