0
$\begingroup$

My understanding is the earbuds that connect to the aux port act as the antenna. It's a long wire. The problem is that the same wire is being used to power your earbuds so you can hear the radio station. This is common on iPods, Zunes, and Smartphones. How can it be an antenna and push audio at the same time?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Audio frequencies are from about 20 to 20,000 Hz. FM broadcast is from 88,000,000 to 108,000,000 Hz.

The current on the wire (let's assume there's just one, to simplify) is just a sum of both the AF and RF signals. Imagine a greatly simplified situation where there is an unmodulated RF transmission at 103 MHz, and an audio tone at 440 Hz. The voltage on the wire is something like:

$$ V(t) = \cos(440 \cdot 2 \pi t) + \cos(103000000 \cdot 2 \pi t) $$

Of course in practice, the FM station isn't broadcasting just an unmodulated carrier, but a more complex waveform. And there aren't just 2 terms in this equation, but thousands: the sum of all the radio transmitters around. And also there's a noise term. But the basic principle stands: the voltage on the wire is a sum of all the things interacting with it through the electromagnetic field.

The FM receiver has a filter, not just to isolate the RF from the AF, but also to select the particular station you want to receive. So it's going to ignore all frequencies except for a 200,000 Hz wide slice somewhere in the FM band, so it sees only the $\cos(103000000 \cdot 2 \pi t)$ term.

Likewise there's a low-pass filter between the audio driver and the wire, isolating the audio circuit from all RF.

It's not magic, really. Filters are everywhere in everyday life. Your eyes, for example, have 3 kinds of cone cells each sensitive to a different range of frequencies. These cells are sensitive to a specific range of frequencies because they filter out all other frequencies. And visual light is just a small slice of the electromagnetic spectrum, but your eyes filter out most of it. It's for this reason you can't see infrared, x-rays, or indeed even the FM radio station you are listening to on the radio, which is electromagnetic radiation exactly like your eyes detect, just at a different frequency.

There are other engineering applications of this principle too. For example, power-line ethernet superimposes a high-frequency data stream on top of the 60 or 50 Hz power that's in your home's mains wiring. Many antennas that require power are powered through their feedline with a bias tee, which allows a DC power feed (0 Hz) and the RF signal to coexist on the same feedline. Phantom power for microphones is the same idea applied to audio frequencies.

For a visual example, look at a graph of $\sin(x) + \sin(6x)$:

enter image description here

Just by looking at it, you can see there are two sine waves here, a low-frequency one and a high-frequency one. They can both exist within the same function without any loss of information. And with a filter, they can be separated.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I bought a powerline adapter kit! It's literally witchcraft. How can this adapter send a wave back where it's being powered from? The AC is so powerful. How do you even send a wave back on it? $\endgroup$ – Derpy Oct 28 at 15:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Derpy How can a boat make a wake on the ocean? They just add together. Then you filter them apart based on their different frequency. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle#/media/… $\endgroup$ – Phil Frost - W8II Oct 28 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Derpy Perhaps consider what happens when two people sing at the same time. Sound waves are not so different from electromagnetic waves. Or when you turn on two flashlights (or monochromatic lasers, if you prefer.) Or when a moon orbits a planet, which is itself orbiting a star. Waves superimposed on other waves are everywhere. $\endgroup$ – Phil Frost - W8II Oct 28 at 15:44
1
$\begingroup$

FM broadcast RF frequencies(88-107 MHz) are independent of lower frequencies in the the audio domain even of they share the same wire.

The earbuds only respond to ~30 to ~3000 KHz thus, ignoring(filtering) the RF on the same wire.

Along the same idea, the radio receiver is tuned to 88 - 107 MHz ignoring(filtering) the audio frequencies. The tuner circuit will exclude all of the lower frequencies by design.

On the earbud side, RF frequencies cannot be produced by the the earbuds, they appear as a short circuit to the earbuds and skip quite happily over them, and are then passed on to the tuner.

Remember that waves continue on no matter the frequency (unless identical frequencies that add together depending on phase either constructively, adding to the power output or destructively reducing the power output through increased standing waves.)

The incidental overlap of destructive possible interference of AF to RF is an instant point in time(every few time-spans) for waves moving close to the speed of light. The interference is so minute it is not detectable using electronic means.


Bottom Line,

For all practical purposes the frequencies on a line are independent of each other.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So if I hook up with an oscilloscope and measure the frequency of the earbuds, I would see a complex wave made up of the audio and all radio frequencies hitting the wire? It's not just the FM radio I'm picking up too. Whatever the wire can pick up in the air? $\endgroup$ – Derpy Oct 28 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ That almost seems hard to believe. That's like black magic. XP radio waves are much weaker than the audio signal. $\endgroup$ – Derpy Oct 28 at 10:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is exactly zero potential for destructive interference between audio and radio frequencies. It's not even minute. They are many octaves apart, and completely orthogonal. $\endgroup$ – Phil Frost - W8II Oct 28 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Derpy no magic involved. If frequency differences of a factor of 1000 or more wouldn't mean things sensitive to one frequency can be insensitive to the other frequencies, your eyes could see xrays. This is a very fundamental property of the math behind any kind of signals: Different frequencies are orthogonal. $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller Oct 28 at 13:30
  • $\begingroup$ 30 to 3000 kHz must be a typo $\endgroup$ – rclocher3 Oct 28 at 14:52
1
$\begingroup$

Quite apart from the huge difference in frequency, another point is that, for the earbuds, the two conductors of the cord carry a "differential" signal. In other word, they, with the earbuds, constitute a complete circuit, break one conductor, & your earbud won't work. As an FM antenna, however, the RF pickuo is "common mode"-----to the RF signal, both conductors appear to be part of the same conductor. The phone's FM radio input circuits have inherent rejection of the differential component.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.