4
$\begingroup$

Either there's a simple answer that I'm not finding in a spec sheet somewhere, or, I'm asking the wrong question!

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

For practical purposes, all frequencies.

If you cut a transmission line into infinitesimal segments, each segment can be modeled as:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

($G$ is conductance, the inverse of resistance)

The characteristic impedance is:

$$ Z_0 = \sqrt{ R + j\omega L \over G+j\omega C } $$

($\omega$ is the angular frequency, two pi times the ordinary frequency in hertz)

Wikipedia has the full derivation, if you're interested.

For a lossless transmission line, the resistance and conductance are zero. So the equation simplifies:

$$ \require{cancel} \begin{align} Z_0 &= \sqrt{ 0+j\omega L \over 0+j\omega C } \\ &= \sqrt{ \cancel{j\omega} L \over \cancel{j\omega} C } \\ &= \sqrt{ L \over C } \end{align} $$

and there is no longer any frequency term.

Real transmission lines of course have some loss, but if the transmission line is any good the loss will be low, and have negligible effect on the characteristic impedance.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The characteristic impedance of a line does change with frequency.

At high frequencies the loss components are effectively zero and $Z_0$ depends only on $L$ and $C$ (per unit length).

But at low frequencies, $R$ (and $G$) cannot be ignored and contribute significantly to the line impedance. There is a "corner frequency" where one regime takes over from the other.

Belden publishes a graph on their blog which I reproduce here:
Belden 75 impedance at low freq

The site PRC68 (Archived) has a detailed derivation of the equations, which I won't transcribe here, but the summary of the examples includes these surprising figures:

  • $600\Omega$ Open Wire Lines as seen on telephone poles, the corner frequency is 194 Hz.
  • CAT5 cable, with two AWG24 wires twisted together, has a nominal impedance at high frequencies of about $110\Omega$. Below 100 kHz though, its impedance rises to $750\angle{-46}^\circ \Omega$ (yes, a complex $Z_0$)
  • RG-58 has a corner frequency of 36 kHz, below this its impedance rises.

See also this excellent PDF by Audio Systems Group, which shows the impedance of a $75\Omega$ coaxial cable rising to $1000\Omega$ at 1 kHz, and almost $10k\Omega$ at 1 Hz.

None of this really matters for hams! You can see the impedance of the coaxial cable is stable down to 100 kHz. It matters (used to matter) to telephone companies, running many kilometres of cable, and carrying frequencies down to 300 Hz.

Upper frequency limit: At even higher frequencies, the coaxial cable starts to support higher order waveguide modes, when its impedance (and loss) changes dramatically. This occurs when the cable diameter is more than $\lambda/2$, approximately.
This effect could possibly be a problem for hams.
On cellular phone towers, before the radios were moved to the mast top, the long run of coax introduced a significant loss. Large diameter cables are used to keep this loss as small as possible, but the cable can't go bigger than about 2 1/4" because the cut-off frequency then gets below 2 GHz, where the cable is used. High power VHF transmitters for example use much larger cable.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Ideally, the impedance is not dependent on frequency. Practical limitations should be stated in the specs.

Also note, that the effective impedance seen at the end of the coax is affected by power travelling "upstream", for example reflected/standing waves. These have to be taken into consideration when there is an impedance mismatch down the transfer line causing part of the power to be reflected back.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello and welcome to ham.stackexchange.com! $\endgroup$ – rclocher3 Jul 22 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ @rclocher3 TNX! I wonder why I haven't popped in earlier! $\endgroup$ – mvuot Jul 22 at 18:21
1
$\begingroup$

The impedance given in a coaxial cable data sheet is its "characteristic" impedance, not its actual impedance. What that means is that "50 Ω" coax will have the least loss when the output impedance of the transmitter is 50 Ω with no reactance, and the impedance of the load (the antenna) is also 50 Ω with no reactance, irregardless of frequency. In the real world the characteristic impedance does vary a little when the frequency changes, but those slight changes result in losses that are too small for hams to worry about.

For people who aren't electrical engineers, the behavior of transmission lines can be quite confusing at first. RF circuits just behave very differently from DC circuits. For instance, if you were to short the far end of a transmission line that is electrically a quarter-wavelength long and then measure its impedance at the near end, you would find a very high impedance, essentially an open circuit. The ARRL Antenna Book does a good job of explaining the subject.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would the downvoter care to explain, or suggest improvements? $\endgroup$ – rclocher3 Jul 23 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ RE: ...What that means is that "50 Ω" coax will have the least loss when the output impedance of the transmitter is 50 Ω with no reactance ... Just to note that transmitters are designed to drive a certain load impedance (often 50 Ω), but their internal source impedance is much lower than that specified load impedance. If it equaled the load impedance, then 50% of the output power generated by the final r-f amplifier in the transmitter would be dissipated as heat, within the transmitter. $\endgroup$ – Richard Fry Jul 25 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ @RichardFry thanks, I didn't know that! $\endgroup$ – rclocher3 Jul 27 at 13:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.