11
$\begingroup$

How does a tiny surface-mount "chip antenna" for the 2.x thru 5.x GHz frequency bands work? What allows such a tiny item to radiate or receive RF with some amount of efficiency? What allows a chip antenna's radiation pattern to be (somewhat?) non-directional compared to a wire antenna?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are probably referring to a patch antenna or microstrip antenna. $\endgroup$
    – Juancho
    Apr 15, 2014 at 1:20
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ A chip antenna can't be any more non-directional than a dipole, because nothing can. See the hairy ball theorem. $\endgroup$ Apr 16, 2014 at 10:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related, on EE.SE: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/243341/… $\endgroup$ Jul 12, 2016 at 23:21
  • $\begingroup$ Gads, @Phil, where did you get that one from? Very interesting. $\endgroup$
    – SDsolar
    May 13, 2017 at 0:04

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

The chip antennas use some material, usually ceramic, that has high permittivity and low losses. In a medium having high permittivity, the wavelength is shorter than in the free space. This way the antenna "sees" the structure that is comparable in the size to the wavelength in the medium, while being very small compared to the free space wavelength.

While receiving, the antenna efficiency is not very crucial parameter since less efficient antenna receive less signal but also less noise from the environment. Thus the signal to noise ratio is the same at the output of the antenna. See the related questions: What is the relationship between SWR and receive performance? and If two antennas of 50 Ω and 377 Ω have VSWR=1:1, then which one is more efficient?

Generally, small antennas tend to be less directive: for example, large dishes have higher gain than Yagis that, in turn, have higher gain than dipoles. Based on empirical googling, the chip antenna manufacturers seem to promise gains approximately in the range of 0...3 dBi. However, with high permittivity substrate you can achieve large gains as well: http://iopscience.iop.org/1347-4065/53/4S/04EL09/article

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .