3
$\begingroup$

I have a homebrew remote antenna switch. It uses relays and it has a nRF24L01-based wireless link to the band selector (Arduino, taps into CAT and switches antennas accordingly).

I would like to power this device without running a separate power cable. I thought of using a bias tee with about 100 to 470nF capacitors, KV rated, several in parallel, and big inductors for DC injection and extraction. Some sources online recommended using a ferrite rod to make the coil, which should provide an inductance into the millihenries.

The questions are:

  1. Is this a good idea?
  2. Will this introduce significant losses into the system?
  3. Will this introduce significant noise into the system?
  4. Is there anything else I should be concerned about?

I've seen at least one supplier of this sort of "bias tee" circutry for HF, but at a price exceeding $250 (which I'm not willing to spend), so I believe it "should work".

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You might be guided by the circuit for the Ameritron RCS-4 Remote Antenna Switch. I have used this unit on HF for decades without any noticeably deleterious effects, though I have never performed any measurements.

The manual shows L201 and C203 filtering the supply to the relay coils. L201, p/n 409-2150, is a 1A 90uH choke. At 1.8-MHz, this provides about 1K$\Omega$ of inductive reactance, which will effectively isolate the RF and DC/low-frequency parts of the system. Of course, this isolation increases with operating frequency.

Off-the-shelf components with these or similar specs (e.g., 1A 100uH) are available in unit quantities for less than US$1 from the usual suppliers (DigiKey, Mouser, Newark, etc.). It's difficult to imagine doing better by winding your own inductor.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's very interesting, I have several inductors that can do the job in my junkbox, including 150uH and 330uH coils. I did some math and thought I'd need much bigger coils to keep the impedance high enough but I suppose if the antenna is matched appropriately, practically all of the power will be sinked by the antenna and nothing by the inductors. $\endgroup$ – hjf May 7 at 13:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.