3
$\begingroup$

(New, simplified edit of the original question)

This question regards erroneous SWR measurements of K6BEZ antenna analyzer design from 2013 using Arduino and AD9850 DDS modules. There have been many variations of it by other people over the years. Good details to make it work right seem hard to find. Here is my circuit for just the bridge section (the FWD and REV go out to the Arduino).

enter image description here

While testing it for SWR with resistors, it only reads correctly at 50 ohms. 100 ohms and 25 ohms both measure about 1.3 SWR and should be 2:1. I believe the problem is the way the bridge drives the op amps. The op amp circuit and onward work fine and calculate the SWR properly if I simulate the supposed bridge detector output using DC voltages. Although the 300mV DDS wave is rather low, the 1N5817 diodes have only 134mV forward voltage drop. Two helpful resources I used to check the bridge operation, were:

1) Wideband SWR meter, using an identical bridge and analog meters (which I built), and

2) Adapting an Antenna Coupler.

Below are photos showing my wiring to mount the RF components as close together as possible.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Below is a graph of SWR on a 20-meter dipole using the Arduino analyzer. The analyzer does seem to show something meaningful but but the valleys are too wide. The red line at 14.250 MHz is where I measured the lowest SWR (resonance?) using the Wideband SWR meter (mentioned above) and it was a sharp dip, unlike the graph from the Arduino analyzer.

Any comments or suggestions would be much appreciated.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I just found a great answer to the problems all in one place in QST, September 2019. The author addresses the same problems in the question, and explains his fixes for a similar bridge-circuit-based Arduino analyzer originally published in QST, November 2017. Also this forum post lists the same problems and planned fixes, so it looks like the answer is that the orginal design had some faults, but they can be fixed.

Update - More information

After days of searching and hitting dozens of dead links, I have dug up some meaningful and linkable documents on the history and evolution of AD9850 Antenna Analyzers. It has been very time-consuming, but educational to find and organize all these as bookmarks and I want to share what I found.

NJQRP DDS Daughtercard Kit, site last updated in 2005, is the earliest mention I've found of a DDS measuring project, although in their page they link to AARL publication - Original DDSVFO Article by Curtis Pruess WB2V, QEX 1997, which was a PIC/AD9850 VFO, essentially the same circuit as an analyzer but without the RF bridge. The daughtercard version, however, included an RF amplifier for the DDS, addressing the low output level even at that time.

DDS-60 Kit from the AmQRP is a current web page with a 2014 upgraded version of the same daughtercard, with history and lots of detail about the daughtercard evolution.

Related to the above daughter cards is WØPCE "Sweep Gen" - Automated DDS Sweep Generator Measurement System that had a dead link to original article by Sam Green, WØPCE (in QEX for Nov-Dec 2008) but which by searching I found mention of a version II in QEX September/October 2012.

I couldn't find mention of early DDS projects used for an antenna analyzer until 2013. The first one seems to be Beric Dunn's K6BEZ Antenna Analyzer. After that, many other analyzers seem to be offshoots of his, including some using the Si5351 DDS. Beric's version did not use an RF amplifier, which I believe is one key problem prompting me to post my question.

Another related project is The Poor Ham's Scalar Network Analyzer (PHSNA) by Nick Kennedy—WA5BDU from 2014. It uses DDS, and also an AD8307 log detector (which I've read can be used instead of the diodes as an improved detector in the bridge.)

In conclusion, a website with files originating from 2016, Antenna Analyzer for Ham Bands by Jack Purdum (W8TEE), Farrukh Zia (K2ZIA) is their project that they published in QST, November 2017. Lots of documentation here! This one uses a nearly identical bridge circuit that Beric's did, but includes an RF amplifier for the DDS. This seems to be the most sophisticated and documented source of all, especially with the mods and customizing mentioned in QST, September 2019.

With the above being the best design articles I've found, I now have accumulated links of many other blogs and forums that have great discussions and ideas about all of this. If anyone posts a specific new question about this subject, I will watch and try to provide a good answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please, where exactly in QST is this info? I can't find it. $\endgroup$ – Brian K1LI 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ I somehow missed it the first time through too. Pages 56-58 of this year's October QST. I just ordered some parts recommended in the article. Original article in Nov 2017 is on pages 40-44. $\endgroup$ – Peter Buxton 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ We must get different versions of the magazine. Pages 56-58 of October 2019 QST are product reviews for soldering guns and a power meter. What is the title of the article? $\endgroup$ – Brian K1LI yesterday
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, Brian, it is the September 2019 issue. I just corrected the date in my answer. $\endgroup$ – Peter Buxton yesterday

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.