1
$\begingroup$

I am curious how much CW power an N connector or SO-239 connector will handle on such a low frequency like 160m band. I know on VHF they will probably handle about 800W before getting too warm.

I have made a high powered transmitter for this band, and I've always used cables with either N or SO-239 in the past. I know something like DIN is recommended for over 1kW, but at these frequencies, I would think the others could handle it. I know the voltage handling of the N connector is 1500 volts peak which is plenty for several kilowatts, but will it get too warm?

https://www.amphenolrf.com/connectors/n-type.html

I am partial to the SO-239 because the center conductor is so much larger.

Does anyone have personal experience using either of these connectors over 1kW? BTW my coax is fine as it's LMR400.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not to worry. :-) They'll both more than handle a steady carrier at the legal limit. I use RG-6 and F connectors, and there was no temperature rise even with my 2000 watt scale pegged into a dummy load. $\endgroup$ – Mike Waters Oct 15 '19 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ I see. LOL thanks ;) ...Oh I thought you were joking about the F connector... That's for TV coax, really? $\endgroup$ – Synaps3 Oct 15 '19 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ Really. Note that this is RG-6 (F-6) and not RG-59. It has an almost identical power handling curve as RG-213. $\endgroup$ – Mike Waters Oct 15 '19 at 22:52
  • $\begingroup$ You might find an answer in in these earlier discussions here. $\endgroup$ – Mike Waters Oct 15 '19 at 22:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of PL-259/SO-239 vs N Type vs BNC which is best connector to use when? $\endgroup$ – ON5MF Jurgen Oct 18 '19 at 9:07
2
$\begingroup$

The average power rating is determined by overheating of the centre contact and is a function of frequency, as heating depends on the resistive insertion loss. Typical makers curves for a new clean connector with a perfect load such as page 275 of [2] for example imply ~5000 watts at 20 MHz and ~500watts at 2 GHz, i.e. a square root frequency derating law as might be expected from skin depth decreasing with frequency.

(From http://www.terminalblock-elinker.com/news/detail.php/id-345.html)

Since he sites 5kW at 20 MHz, and power handling decreasing with increasing frequency, I think it's safe to say that 2kW at 1.8MHz is no problem. (Edit: Corrected the power rating at 20MHz)

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I can testify to that. Years ago, I witnessed 10 kW sustained at approximately 160m. $\endgroup$ – Mike Waters Oct 17 '19 at 16:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.