I've read that the Friis transmission equation can be applied to calculate path loss in ideal space. However, I'd like to better understand the factors that define it and what it represents, and why it is the equation it is.

  • $\begingroup$ It is very important to understand what Friis coined in the 1940s is his "Transmission Formula" and not simply a path loss calculator. The words 'path loss' do nothing to help understand the larger meaning of his intent. $\endgroup$
    – JSH
    Feb 6, 2018 at 20:23

1 Answer 1


Let's imagine that there are two antennas, entirely in free space. There is no Earth or any other object near enough to affect propagation. Let's also assume that these antennas are far enough apart that the antennas interact only by their far fields.

To start, let's assume that both antennas are isotropic, meaning that they radiate equally in each direction. If we supply a pulse of energy to such an antenna, this energy will spread out as a sphere, to infinity, at the speed of light. It also means that if we supply a constant power to such an antenna, then for any sized sphere centered on that antenna, the power passing through that sphere is equal to the power being fed to the antenna.1

If we are interested in the power received by an antenna at distance $r$ from the transmitting antenna, then all the transmitted power will be spread across a sphere of radius $r$ by the time it reaches the receiving antenna. The area of that sphere is $ 4 \pi r^2 $. The transmit power $P_t$ divided by that area gives us:

$$ P_t \over 4 \pi r^2 \tag{1} $$

This number has units $\mathrm W/\mathrm m^2$ and is a power flux density or irradiance. A watt is one joule per second, so a power flux density of $1\mathrm W/\mathrm m^2$ means that every second, one joule of energy passes through an area of one square meter.

Isotropic antennas can't exist2, and even a dipole has some gain3. Assuming the receiving antenna is in the direction of maximum gain, this multiplies the power flux density, so if the transmitting antenna's gain is $G_t$, the equation becomes

$$ {P_t \over 4 \pi r^2} G_t \tag{2} $$

This gives us the power flux density at the receiving antenna, but how much of this power is received? The antenna aperture answers that question. Let's call the aperture of the receiving antenna $A_r$. The power received ($P_r$) is then

$$ P_r = {P_t \over 4 \pi r^2} G_t A_r \tag{3} $$

Effective aperture $A$ and gain $G$ are related by

$$ A = {\lambda^2 \over 4 \pi} G \tag{4} $$

Substituting this into equation 3 gives us

$$ P_r = {P_t \over 4 \pi r^2} G_t {\lambda^2 \over 4 \pi} G_r $$


$$ P_r = P_t G_t G_r \left({\lambda \over 4 \pi r}\right)^2 $$

Or rewritten to use decibels:

$$ P_{r(\mathrm{dB})} = P_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{r(\mathrm{dB})} + 20 \log_{10} \left({\lambda \over 4 \pi r}\right) $$

Since wavelength is a function of frequency and the speed of light ($\lambda = c/f$), the equation can also be written:

$$ P_{r(\mathrm{dB})} = P_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{r(\mathrm{dB})} + 20 \log_{10} \left({c \over 4 \pi r f}\right) $$

Finally, we can factor out the constant ${c \over 4 \pi}$ and write that as:

$$ P_{r(\mathrm{dB})} = P_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{t(\mathrm{dB})} + G_{r(\mathrm{dB})} + 147.6 - 20 \log_{10} (rf) $$


  • $r$ is the distance between antennas in meters, and
  • $f$ is the frequency in Hz.

This formula is essential to the calculation of link budgets, and gives the best case path loss. It's then easier to consider other sources of loss as separate factors.

1: this means you can build a Dyson sphere around a star, capturing all of its energy.

2: at least, not ones that emit coherent radiation. The sun can be (approximately) isotropic because the light (a kind of electromagnetic radiation) it emits is not coherent.

3: 1.62, or 2.15 dBi, for a half-wave dipole.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .