Going through a number of schematics for today's receivers (Elecraft KX3, for example) I note that most use LC circuits for filtering. The wikipedia article for Crystal Filters suggests, however, that crystal filters are used in high quality receivers:

A crystal filter is very often found in the intermediate frequency (IF) stages of high-quality radio receivers. Cheaper sets may use ceramic filters ... or tuned LC circuits.

What are the disadvantages of crystal filters that make LC filters more popular for amateur radio transceivers?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Just a guess: cost. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 20:55
  • $\begingroup$ That could be. I suspect size may have a role to play in some receivers as well. But since I'm at the beginning of the journey to understand the circuits I'm wondering if there's more to it than that. $\endgroup$
    – Adam Davis
    Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ It's worth noting that the statement you quote is not cited. The only source cited in that paragraph is Horst Stader and Jack A. Hardcastle, "Crystal Ladder Filters for All", QEX, pp.14-18 Nov-Dec 2009, which even though I haven't checked it out in depth does not seem to provide a citation for the quoted statement. That said, interesting question. $\endgroup$
    – user
    Commented Feb 14, 2014 at 14:31

4 Answers 4


As Phil Genera says, the KX3 uses a different type of receiver that requires a different kind of filter. A traditional superheterodyne receiver, which is what you'd find in most older radios, uses a mixer to convert the desired signal to a fixed IF of say 10.7MHz and then uses a very narrow bandpass filter at that frequency to select only that signal. Crystal filters are particularly well suited here because they're extremely narrow, stable bandpass filters - far narrower and more stable than can be achieved with LC bandpass filters. Ceramic filters are very similar but cheaper, less narrow, and less stable.

The KX3 doesn't work like that. It's a quadrature direct conversion receiver - instead of converting the signal to IF, it converts it to a pair of I and Q signals at around audio frequencies, and then uses a pair of lowpass filters to filter out all the other frequencies, which can easily be implemented as standard LC filters. (Though looking at the schematic, those aren't the only filters - there's also some active filtering in the following amplifier stages. See the capacitors in the op-amp feedback loops? Those turn the amplifiers into additional low-pass filters. This is a very common and effective way of filtering audio-frequency signals.)

There is also a subsequent software filtering stage that's far sharper and more adjustable than the hardware filters, but this isn't specific to direct conversion designs - there are modern ham transceivers out there that use traditional superheterodyne receivers with a standard IF filter, followed by adjustable software filters.

So you might ask, why use such a high intermediate frequency if it makes constructing filters harder? Image rejection. The mixer doesn't just convert our desired frequency to the IF, it also does the same with an image frequency exactly twice the IF away from the frequency we want. Since we can't make tunable RF filters that are anywhere near as narrow as our fixed-frequency IF filter, we have to make the IF high enough that we can stop the image frequency reaching the mixer using a relatively wide input filter. Using separate I and Q signals makes it possible to distinguish signals at the desired and image frequencies and makes direct conversion practical, but only if all the stages after the IQ conversion are done in software rather than hardware.


The KX3 receiver is a software defined radio SDR. The IF filters are made in the software. Since software IF filters are steeper than crystal filters the crystal filters are not necessary anymore. Another advantage is that SDR IF filter width is continuous adjustable. But band filters and audio filters are still LC filters like in the past. That has not changed. The IF of the KX3 is at audio frequencies. It is not really direct conversion but it is similar. These audio frequencies are fed to usually a soundcard and then the computer does the IF filtering demodulation etc. The KX3 is the first software defined radio that does not require a external computer. It’s a great radio. I ‘m never gonna sell it.

More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software-defined_radio

  • $\begingroup$ "The KX3 is the first software defined radio that does not require a external computer." Citation needed? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2014 at 22:22
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding the KX3 being the first SDR that does not require an external computer -- It may or may not be the first ever but it is definitely the first commercially successful SDR without need of an external computer. Actually, in a way, you do need an external computer. Software/firmware updates are made via a host computer but of course that is not required during operation. I am another KX3 owner that will never sell. In fact, I own just about everything that Elecraft has ever made. $\endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    Commented Nov 15, 2015 at 6:22

In the KX3, the filters are operating at audio frequencies, not IF (as there is no IF in a direct conversion design).

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That is an interesting fact, but I don't see how it answers the question. What are the disadvantages of crystal filters that make LC filters more popular for amateur radio transceivers? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 13, 2014 at 12:55

Selecting a set of crystals with almost the same frequency requires one to test many more crystals than the required number for that circuit. For example, to select a set of five crystals one would have buy at least 20 and test each one.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .