When discussing improvements to my home HDTV Antenna/distribution system a colleague brought up the need to terminate all coax, even unused splitter ports.

My understanding of the way terminator works is that they prevent wave reflection, which can cause ghosting in analog signals and in my case - digital HDTV - noise. However for the reflection to introduce noise I assume you need some cable length, so that the reflected signal is actually offset from the main one.

In the case of a splitter the length is very short - limited to the splitter's own wiring. Would that still be enough to cause noise? If not, could it even have the inverse effect of preventing an in-phase reflection from actually boosting the signal's strength to used ports?


3 Answers 3


Terminating unused ports will never make things worse, and indeed is necessary to provide "ideal" behavior. Is ideal behavior really necessary? It depends on the application. Is your setup working now? If so, terminators aren't necessary :-)

A typical splitter has these properties:

  • It has an input port and two output ports, which we'll call A and B.
  • It has high isolation, meaning power going into one output port doesn't show up at the other output port.
  • It is matched, meaning the impedance looking in to any port is the same (usually one of 75 or 50 ohms).
  • It is reciprocal, meaning it works in either direction: it can also be used as a combiner.

This sounds like nothing could go wrong: since the outputs are isolated then leaving one of them unterminated couldn't cause problems with the other output.

However, when the port is left open, it reflects all the power, and then you have to consider how that affects the other components. Even though the ports may be labeled "output", they are still inputs because the splitter is reciprocal. Power reflected from an output port is an input that must be considered.

For example, say 1 W enters the input port. One output is connected to a TV, which we assume is properly terminated internally. The other port is left open. (In practice the power is orders of magnitude less: I want to keep the numbers simple.)


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

What happens:

  1. 1 W enters the input.
  2. The splitter divides that power evenly between the outputs. So 0.5 W comes out of each output.
  3. On port A, that power is converted to heat in the TV and we don't need to worry about it anymore.
  4. On port B, there's nowhere for the power to go so it's reflected. Now it's an input on "output B". Although it's called an "output", because the splitter is a reciprocal device, it works an an input, too.
  5. Half of the reflected power is lost as heat in the splitter.
  6. The other half is sent out the "input" port.
  7. Depends on what's attached to the input port!

If the input port is also 75 ohms, the reflected power is absorbed there, and we don't ever see it again. This reflected power means the source does not "see" 75 ohms, however that's unlikely to be an issue in practice for a TV system.

But if the input port isn't 75 ohms, the reflected power gets re-reflected and is sent another time into the input port. Now you have the opportunity for ghosting.

However in most cases, a number of factors combine to make this not that big of a deal.

  1. The source may not be 75 ohms, but it's not usually that far off. So the source does end up absorbing a significant fraction of the reflected power.
  2. The real world is already full of reflections. If the source is an antenna, it already contains time-shifted "ghosts" from the signal finding its way to you by multiple paths of differing length. An HDTV receiver employs channel equalization to compensate for this to some extent.
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If the splitter is located outdoors, the "terminator" may also serve as weather protection. That may be even more important than creating a uniform-impedance electrical environment. $\endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Oct 12, 2018 at 12:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ One anecdote: Way back when, our local repeater was suffering horrible QRM. One of the local hams finally tracked it down to an unterminated 75 ohm feed in the electronics section of Sears at the mall 2 miles away. $\endgroup$
    – Duston
    Oct 12, 2018 at 14:06

Lack of termination is a particular case of impedance mismatch. An impedance mismatch on one port of a power divider ("coax splitter") means that the common port of the divider itself will not present the the intended impedance to the incoming signal.

(From a circuit analysis perspective, this is the same thing as a lumped-component network of some sort that has the wrong impedance on its ports for the pair of transmission lines attached to it. No lengths of unterminated line are necessary.)

This mismatch will cause reflections which propagate backwards along the line. What happens after that depends on the electrical characteristics of the next thing-that-is-not-a-transmission-line the reflection hits, but a simple case is if there is another similar mismatch in the line, which will produce the second (forward) reflection called ghosting, the time between reflection depending on the length of line between those two defects.

  • $\begingroup$ So considering the common port is connected directly to an antenna or amplifier and my only concern is downstream signal, the impedance mismatch won't cause any issue correct? $\endgroup$ Oct 12, 2018 at 13:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ThomasGuyot-Sionnest Antenna, correct (it goes out the antenna and causes more multipath in the air, but no more than random buildings and other objects); amplifier, not sure, might depend. $\endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    Oct 12, 2018 at 14:50

yes it is always needed.

Otherwise your coax may behave like an antenna and radiate interference

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sorry for the downvote, but your answer is oversimplified and doesn't say anything that the other answers don't already say. Please don't take it personally. There are lots of questions out there that need better answers. $\endgroup$
    – rclocher3
    Jun 15, 2021 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ Please note that I specifically mentioned unused ports were not connected to coax so will female ports (with only a recessed connector) radiate much if anything? Also afaik antennas work best by reflecting waves and per the previous comments I believe even with a coax there would be very litle radiation since one end would absorb them (at least 50%/split upstream then again downstream if it's not already radiated through the antenna). There's also no evidence this radiation inside the house could cause any harm to devices connected through coax with an external antenna. $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2021 at 16:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .