Skip to main content
Added a pretty significant paragraph at the end re band-pass filters; please revert if inappropriate!
Source Link
webmarc
  • 4.7k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 44

A larger antenna shouldn't damage a handheld radio. In a quiet area, it will make its receiver more sensitive, and it will radiate more power when transmitting.


Try to keep a receiving antenna away from a transmitter, to reduce the risk of damaging the receiver. I suspect we've all gotten away with it - my 50 W, 2 m mag mount was 30 cm from my car radio antenna and it wasn't damaged.

What you might find when adding an efficient, higher gain antenna to a handheld, is that it gets overloaded by strong signals near the amateur bands, making it more difficult to hear the station you want. (This isn't dangerous, the power levels are still very small).

Handheld radios are a compromise because of their small size and battery power, and often have a) less effective filtering and b) less robust receive amplifiers. Pre-amplifiers can be made more resistant to strong signals, by running them at a higher current. A handheld radio can't afford to waste 150 mW, so they use lower IP3, lower current amplifiers. c) finally the handheld expects to have a fairly poor antenna on it, which attenuates all the signals, so the receiver will be designed for that.

On a viewing platform on hilltop in the middle of a city, I've found that my handheld, with its short antenna, was nearly useless. All kinds of noises were breaking through and overlapping with the amateur signals.

If the purpose of the larger/higher-gain antenna is to improve receive, you might couple it with a band-pass filter (either commercial or DIY) that can greatly mitigate out of band interference from strong signals... BUT at the cost of some insertion loss for both transmit and receive. There's just no free lunch!

A larger antenna shouldn't damage a handheld radio. In a quiet area, it will make its receiver more sensitive, and it will radiate more power when transmitting.


Try to keep a receiving antenna away from a transmitter, to reduce the risk of damaging the receiver. I suspect we've all gotten away with it - my 50 W, 2 m mag mount was 30 cm from my car radio antenna and it wasn't damaged.

What you might find when adding an efficient, higher gain antenna to a handheld, is that it gets overloaded by strong signals near the amateur bands, making it more difficult to hear the station you want. (This isn't dangerous, the power levels are still very small).

Handheld radios are a compromise because of their small size and battery power, and often have a) less effective filtering and b) less robust receive amplifiers. Pre-amplifiers can be made more resistant to strong signals, by running them at a higher current. A handheld radio can't afford to waste 150 mW, so they use lower IP3, lower current amplifiers. c) finally the handheld expects to have a fairly poor antenna on it, which attenuates all the signals, so the receiver will be designed for that.

On a viewing platform on hilltop in the middle of a city, I've found that my handheld, with its short antenna, was nearly useless. All kinds of noises were breaking through and overlapping with the amateur signals.

A larger antenna shouldn't damage a handheld radio. In a quiet area, it will make its receiver more sensitive, and it will radiate more power when transmitting.


Try to keep a receiving antenna away from a transmitter, to reduce the risk of damaging the receiver. I suspect we've all gotten away with it - my 50 W, 2 m mag mount was 30 cm from my car radio antenna and it wasn't damaged.

What you might find when adding an efficient, higher gain antenna to a handheld, is that it gets overloaded by strong signals near the amateur bands, making it more difficult to hear the station you want. (This isn't dangerous, the power levels are still very small).

Handheld radios are a compromise because of their small size and battery power, and often have a) less effective filtering and b) less robust receive amplifiers. Pre-amplifiers can be made more resistant to strong signals, by running them at a higher current. A handheld radio can't afford to waste 150 mW, so they use lower IP3, lower current amplifiers. c) finally the handheld expects to have a fairly poor antenna on it, which attenuates all the signals, so the receiver will be designed for that.

On a viewing platform on hilltop in the middle of a city, I've found that my handheld, with its short antenna, was nearly useless. All kinds of noises were breaking through and overlapping with the amateur signals.

If the purpose of the larger/higher-gain antenna is to improve receive, you might couple it with a band-pass filter (either commercial or DIY) that can greatly mitigate out of band interference from strong signals... BUT at the cost of some insertion loss for both transmit and receive. There's just no free lunch!

Source Link
tomnexus
  • 12.2k
  • 16
  • 34

A larger antenna shouldn't damage a handheld radio. In a quiet area, it will make its receiver more sensitive, and it will radiate more power when transmitting.


Try to keep a receiving antenna away from a transmitter, to reduce the risk of damaging the receiver. I suspect we've all gotten away with it - my 50 W, 2 m mag mount was 30 cm from my car radio antenna and it wasn't damaged.

What you might find when adding an efficient, higher gain antenna to a handheld, is that it gets overloaded by strong signals near the amateur bands, making it more difficult to hear the station you want. (This isn't dangerous, the power levels are still very small).

Handheld radios are a compromise because of their small size and battery power, and often have a) less effective filtering and b) less robust receive amplifiers. Pre-amplifiers can be made more resistant to strong signals, by running them at a higher current. A handheld radio can't afford to waste 150 mW, so they use lower IP3, lower current amplifiers. c) finally the handheld expects to have a fairly poor antenna on it, which attenuates all the signals, so the receiver will be designed for that.

On a viewing platform on hilltop in the middle of a city, I've found that my handheld, with its short antenna, was nearly useless. All kinds of noises were breaking through and overlapping with the amateur signals.