Timeline for Testing old coax cable
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2022 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackHam/status/1563677833309962240 | ||
| Aug 21, 2022 at 3:17 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Aug 21, 2022 at 1:49 | history | edited | Duston | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2022 at 0:21 | vote | accept | Duston | ||
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:48 | answer | added | Marcus Müller | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:42 | history | edited | Marcus Müller | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:37 | history | edited | Marcus Müller | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:32 | comment | added | Duston | Test was done on 144MHz. Dummy load is 50 Ohm. | |
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:30 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | and, which frequency was this measurement done at? A loss of, say, 9 dB over 20m, would be much, but possibly in spec, for the original cable datasheet, in the 9cm band. For 30 MHz, it would be undisputable inadequate. | |
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:21 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | reflex, default question: The dummy load is properly impedance-matched to the cabling, right? | |
| Aug 20, 2022 at 19:11 | history | asked | Duston | CC BY-SA 4.0 |