Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 10, 2020 at 22:28 history edited Phil Frost - W8II CC BY-SA 4.0
added 150 characters in body
Dec 10, 2020 at 22:25 comment added Phil Frost - W8II @F.Sessink Yes, good point. I tried to broach this a little in the last paragraph: the filter response is just one of many concerns that weigh in the overall design. You are right that in most designs, there will be concerns other than the asymmetrical response of the filter that can contribute more significantly to performance.
Dec 10, 2020 at 21:44 comment added user16925 The sideband suppression of the filter does not need to better than the phase noise at that (unwanted sideband) frequency. Reciprocal mixing with phase noise is probably determining/limiting the power in the sideband (at TX) and the selectivity of the receiver at RX.
Dec 10, 2020 at 20:49 comment added Phil Frost - W8II @F.Sessink sorry I'm not following your comment. What 1 kHz offset?
Dec 10, 2020 at 20:27 comment added user16925 Huh? What is your phase noise at 1 kHz offset?
Dec 10, 2020 at 16:18 comment added Buck8pe Super, that's reassuring.
Dec 10, 2020 at 16:06 comment added Phil Frost - W8II @Buck8pe yes, because it provides for greater attenuation of the image frequency, which is red in the illustrations above.
Dec 10, 2020 at 14:41 comment added Buck8pe Thanks for that Phil, intuitively explained as always! But, regarding my plan to chose USB but select a higher frequency LO (than RF). I've noted how that seems to place the lower end of the USB at the higher end of the filter passband. I assume then that this is desirable, since it places the carrier end at the side with steeper attenuation slope?
Dec 10, 2020 at 14:22 history edited Phil Frost - W8II CC BY-SA 4.0
added 435 characters in body
Dec 10, 2020 at 14:13 history answered Phil Frost - W8II CC BY-SA 4.0