Timeline for Why is antenna aperture a function of wavelength?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Feb 6, 2018 at 20:29 | comment | added | JSH | I'll just add to the answers here that the lambda term is in there simply because Friis defined it that way during his attempt to suggest another way to express antenna gain... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
S Jun 8, 2017 at 1:20 | history | bounty ended | Phil Frost - W8II | ||
S Jun 8, 2017 at 1:20 | history | notice removed | Phil Frost - W8II | ||
S Jun 7, 2017 at 0:19 | history | bounty started | Phil Frost - W8II | ||
S Jun 7, 2017 at 0:19 | history | notice added | Phil Frost - W8II | Reward existing answer | |
Jun 1, 2017 at 18:30 | vote | accept | Phil Frost - W8II | ||
Jun 1, 2017 at 17:56 | answer | added | Glenn W9IQ | timeline score: 6 | |
May 30, 2017 at 21:53 | answer | added | sm5bsz | timeline score: 1 | |
May 28, 2017 at 22:11 | comment | added | Scott Earle♦ | I know, but I was referring to the recent conversation in meta about using dB and not watts, and it just makes sense to be consistent :) | |
May 28, 2017 at 16:44 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | @ScottEarle 1 = 0dB (dBi if you want to be more specific) because $10^{0/10} = 1$. | |
May 28, 2017 at 14:46 | comment | added | Scott Earle♦ | Is the gain 1 or is it 0dB? I thought we recently had this discussion | |
May 26, 2017 at 18:27 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | @MikeWaters Sure it does. The gain is 1, by definition of "isotropic antenna". | |
May 26, 2017 at 18:19 | comment | added | Mike Waters | The first formula does not take gain into account. | |
May 26, 2017 at 18:17 | answer | added | Mike Waters | timeline score: 0 | |
May 26, 2017 at 14:37 | answer | added | user9740 | timeline score: 0 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://ham.stackexchange.com/ with https://ham.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Sep 21, 2016 at 2:52 | answer | added | Jacob F. Davis C-CISO | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 8, 2014 at 12:47 | comment | added | Phil Frost - W8II | Physics.SE has a detailed mathematical analysis at Effective aperture of isotropic antenna. | |
Feb 28, 2014 at 1:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackHam/status/439213920700887040 | ||
Feb 27, 2014 at 13:43 | history | edited | Phil Frost - W8II | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use on-site link for Friis
|
Feb 27, 2014 at 6:33 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 25, 2014 at 18:05 | history | edited | Kevin Reid AG6YO♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling in title, math typography
|
Feb 25, 2014 at 17:38 | history | asked | Phil Frost - W8II | CC BY-SA 3.0 |